PR research priorities - final report
After three months of discussion, the Study of the Priorities for Public Relations Research (PR Priorities Study - final report) has been completed. The initial piloting was undertaken on DummySpit in April and led to the setting of 26 public relations topics. These were sent to a Delphi study panel (of experts) in five continents covering top academics, leading practitioners and the CEOs of PR industry bodies. After three rounds of intensive email debate, the Top Ten PR research topics are:
1) Public relations’ role in contributing to strategic decision-making, strategy development and realisation, and organisational functioning
2) The value that public relations creates for organisations through building social capital, managing key relationships and realising organisational advantage
3) The measurement and evaluation of public relations, both offline and online
4) Public relations as a fundamental management function
5) Professional skills in public relations; analysis of the industry’s need for education
6) Research into standards of performance among PR professionals; the licensing of practitioners
7) Management of corporate reputation; measurement of reputation
Ethics in public relations
9) Integration of public relations with other communication functions; the scope of public relations practice; discipline boundaries
10) Management of relationships
Just outside the top ranked priorities are:
11) Client/employer understanding of public relations
12) The impact of technology on public relations practice and theory.
This report is the first completed international study on public relations research priorities (using a Delphi panel) since the mid-1990s and gives valuable insight into the ‘front and centre’ public relations research areas around the world.
The results will allow academics and practitioners to work closely together to improve understanding of public relations and its most effective and ethical use. It is a benchmark that all research plans and funding can be judged by for relevance and importance.
Comments(8)