<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buzz marketing &#8211; an ethical &#8220;black hole&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dummyspit.wordpress.com/2007/04/08/buzz-marketing-an-ethical-black-hole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dummyspit.wordpress.com/2007/04/08/buzz-marketing-an-ethical-black-hole/</link>
	<description>Discussion on public relations practice and research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:04:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heather Yaxley</title>
		<link>http://dummyspit.wordpress.com/2007/04/08/buzz-marketing-an-ethical-black-hole/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Yaxley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dummyspit.wordpress.com/2007/04/08/buzz-marketing-an-ethical-black-hole/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see more openness in traditional media clarifying their interests when recommending products.  Whether it is restaurant or wine reviews, fashion/beauty products, the travel industry, or my own area of motoring, for example, I think it is about time all journalists were more open about whether they have been been given hospitality or &quot;free&quot; products/loans.

Access prior to launch of new products and/or trips to facilities is necessary and a well established PR-media practice.  But I feel more transparency has to be a good thing.

On the paid-to-buzz question - we all learn to ignore any friend or contact who makes a bad recommendation.  I agree that openness is ideal, but I don&#039;t mind someone being paid if their advice is good - but then if they are making good recommendations, they probably don&#039;t need to be paid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see more openness in traditional media clarifying their interests when recommending products.  Whether it is restaurant or wine reviews, fashion/beauty products, the travel industry, or my own area of motoring, for example, I think it is about time all journalists were more open about whether they have been been given hospitality or &#8220;free&#8221; products/loans.</p>
<p>Access prior to launch of new products and/or trips to facilities is necessary and a well established PR-media practice.  But I feel more transparency has to be a good thing.</p>
<p>On the paid-to-buzz question &#8211; we all learn to ignore any friend or contact who makes a bad recommendation.  I agree that openness is ideal, but I don&#8217;t mind someone being paid if their advice is good &#8211; but then if they are making good recommendations, they probably don&#8217;t need to be paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drmike</title>
		<link>http://dummyspit.wordpress.com/2007/04/08/buzz-marketing-an-ethical-black-hole/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>drmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dummyspit.wordpress.com/2007/04/08/buzz-marketing-an-ethical-black-hole/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I would have loved to have had one of the laptops.  Would have put it to good use, even if I had to publicly state where it came from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have loved to have had one of the laptops.  Would have put it to good use, even if I had to publicly state where it came from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
